<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Quiver of a 17th Century Courtesan&#8217;s Inner Thigh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://procrastiblog.com/2009/11/15/the-quiver-of-a-17th-century-courtesans-inner-thigh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://procrastiblog.com/2009/11/15/the-quiver-of-a-17th-century-courtesans-inner-thigh/</link>
	<description>A place to document tips and tricks for the various Linux, LaTeX, OCaml, and other general computer-related topics that I encounter in my daily life and a repository for supposedly amusing observations, hyperlinks, recipes, reviews, travelogues, and political opinions written when I have a spare moment (or when I don't have a spare moment, but I don't feel like working)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://procrastiblog.com/2009/11/15/the-quiver-of-a-17th-century-courtesans-inner-thigh/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://procrastiblog.com/?p=898#comment-630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I want to know is: was the quivering qualitatively different and better in the 17th century than in the 16th or the 18th? Has it been all downhill for courtesans for the last 400 years?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is: was the quivering qualitatively different and better in the 17th century than in the 16th or the 18th? Has it been all downhill for courtesans for the last 400 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

