With all due respect to my blogging/life partner, this explanation is no more credible than if she claimed to be establishing a model democracy in the middle of my face. Whatever after-the-fact justifications H might provide in order to maintain public support for her bellicose position, it is clear to me—and, I think, to any reasonable observer—that the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy of removing my beard.
June 26, 2006
3 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Procrastiblog 
I would agree with that, but I think that the accumulation of points H put together – presumably truth – clearly neccessitated the removal of the beard. I don’t think we’ll all find out in six months that you didn’t actually have any food in your beard or a scratchy neck. Speaking of hair, mine is shaggy and my barber’s fled the country.
Comment by Stephen — June 27, 2006 @ 11:28 am
Your beard posed an imminent threat to the security of all around you. Decisive action had to be taken. We’re not going to let you second-guess the vital efforts taken to protect us all.
Comment by AC — June 30, 2006 @ 4:04 pm
Ok, this husband and wife blogging thing has the potential for great cuteness. Like kitten cuteness. Like totoro cuteness.
Comment by Ben Osheroff — July 1, 2006 @ 11:42 pm